“His blood is on your hands.”

“You don’t know, Barry? Let me help enlighten you – calling Trump “Hitler” for a decade and using your propaganda media to paint Trump and his supporters as literal Nazi’s is probably a good place for you to start your “investigation,” you fucking abomination.”

“The rhetoric in the Democrat Party is what motivated this attack you sanctimonious piece of shit. It’s people like you who gave rise to the radical left. The same radical left that tried to assassinate Trump, and likely the same radical left that just assassinated Charlie Kirk.”

“For years your rhetoric painted Christians and conservatives as dangerous… you mocked us, dismissed us, and fueled the very climate that leads to moments like this. Now you suddenly say violence has no place in our democracy? Charlie Kirk was a husband, a father, and a follower of Jesus Christ. His only “crime” was speaking truth. Don’t act shocked when the seeds you helped plant bear this bitter fruit.”

“Obama pushed violent rhetoric in most of his speeches! And his has the nerve to post this about Charlie Kirk! Obama and the democrats ARE THE PROBLEM! They ARE the Party of VIOLENCE!”

“You started and motivated this. He was ASSASSINATED. People like you don’t pray for good, you’re evil. You all cheered when they tried to assassinate Trump. Your base even bagged someone to “not miss” next time. The only praying you did was for results like this today.”

“Get fucked”

“No one wants your prayers”

“It was YOU, you son of a bitch. YOU stoked the fires to all of this, you HEATHEN”

“You have blood on your hands, scumbag”

“We know what motivated Charlie’s assassin. It was you and your party of demons.”

“We are a Constitutional Republic and you rebirthed the color revolution single handedly promoting hate and violence leading to the division and political divide we have today.”

“Idle Tool Syndrome”

noun — The condition where a shop fills with powerful machines (3D printers, CNC tables, scanners, GPUs) that sit quietly waiting, not for power or parts, but for a guiding hand to actually use them.

Training models is the process of teaching a computer program to recognize patterns in data. This involves providing the computer with large amounts of labeled data and allowing it to learn from that data, adjusting the model’s parameters.

The process of training models is computationally intensive, requiring specialized hardware like GPUs to accelerate computations and reduce training time. Training models on AMD GPUs involves leveraging the parallel processing capabilities of these GPUs to significantly speed up the model training process in machine learning and deep learning tasks.

Training models on AMD GPUs with the ROCm™ software platform allows you to use the powerful parallel processing capabilities and efficient compute resource management, significantly improving training time and overall performance in machine learning applications.

anything above 30 tokens/sec is very usable. That coupled with the affordability, safety and availability of our AMD GPU is no less than a win!

"Using amd XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Triple Fan 20GB GDDR6 PCIe 4.0 Graphics Card"

+ Free Shipping

$631

Setting up LLM with AMD

https://medium.com/data-science-collective/unleashing-llms-with-team-red-your-guide-to-amd-powered-local-ai-3be6ea745f0f

Major Study Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Violate ‘Biological Weapons Convention’

Does this hold water? Because Nvidia fanboys buy this thinking it'll be worth the upgrade from their 4070 only to realize $550+ for >10% uplift isn't worth it. Gone are the days of 30%+ gen over gen improvements.

NVIDIA has shifted to a model of smaller uplifts and higher prices per tier.

Result: they get stuck paying $550+ for what’s essentially a sidegrade with slightly better efficiency.

Yes, the logic is sound. The 70-series no longer guarantees the big uplift it once did, and NVIDIA leans on marketing + naming to sell what are really incremental upgrades. The “fanboys” criticism comes from people who notice the shift and think buyers are rewarding NVIDIA for shrinking generational progress.

this is a comment referancing the nvidia gpu can you make sense of it? But the naming stack shifted down. This "70" series is really a "60" series. So no the inflation argument doesn't work because these cards have been cut down from their predecessors.

The commenter means NVIDIA rebranded lower-tier GPUs with higher-tier names (a 70 that performs like a 60), so price increases aren’t just inflation—they’re also a result of NVIDIA shifting the product stack to make you pay more for less.